<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lead Nurturing Doesn&amp;amp;amp;amp;#039;t Add Cost &#8211; It Reduces Cost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nurturehq.com/lead-nurturing-doesnt-add-cost-it-reduces-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nurturehq.com/lead-nurturing-doesnt-add-cost-it-reduces-cost/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:39:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin Hitt</title>
		<link>http://blog.nurturehq.com/lead-nurturing-doesnt-add-cost-it-reduces-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nurturehq.com/?p=22#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I completely agree.  Even lead generation over existing house lists is better than farming cold lists.  The key is balance over all lead channels and types.  However, let&#039;s not forget the power of tracking to know which lead effort produces which result (from a profit and loss prospective.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Justin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree.  Even lead generation over existing house lists is better than farming cold lists.  The key is balance over all lead channels and types.  However, let&#39;s not forget the power of tracking to know which lead effort produces which result (from a profit and loss prospective.)</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Justin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
